Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossland College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Stifle (talk) 10:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crossland College

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orgininally PRODed article with the rationale "No WP:SIGCOV of this college or any obvious notability established. Only source is to the official college website. Tagged for notability since 2010."

The PROD was later removed by an IP with the rationale "I found https://www.daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay?newsID=861978 in Google News". The source they referenced is just talking about the school principal being awarded a non-notable "best principal" award (not to mention the website is full of spammy advertisements, so it's likely not a WP:RS) without discussing anything else about the college nor helps further establish any notability for the college. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 18:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 18:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Karnataka. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - This college appears to be comparatively more notable than some other colleges and universities in India. There appears to be some RS (ish) coverage by The Hindu, The Deccan Herald, Mangalore Today and two articles in Daji World as noted by the nominator themselves. -- Sohom Datta (talk) 00:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per Sohom Datta added references.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.