Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruise1st Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cruise1st Australia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable company that does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Full disclosure: I am the admin that closed the deletion discussion for Cruise1st as delete. Upon performing unlinking for that article, I found this article and after unlinking performed WP:BEFORE searches, but this company also does not appear to meet notability standards. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the citations are either OR or contingent on Cruise1st launching it and even if notability couldn't be inherited, there isn't any to inherit. There are a couple of mentions in articles about individual cruises but they are passing - there isn't much at all about the company itself. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think we deleted the parent Cruise1st recently, not sure why we'd want a regional Cruise1st. Szzuk (talk) 08:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.