Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cubetoons (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 04:18, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Cubetoons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Webcomic which fails WP:WEB and WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources comes up through Google, and it's very unlikely there's anything in paper. Claritas § 20:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - I don't consider the fact that it appears on IGN an automatic indicator of notability, because it is not independent of the site. 20:14, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Publishing something on IGN does not make it notable per se. --84.57.164.11 (talk) 14:19, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.