Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultivation Capital
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 04:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cultivation Capital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Small VC firm with very little funds that fails WP:CORP. All coverage is in passing in minor local publications, except perhaps this one, which is still as part of a group of companies featured. Rest is blogs, press releases, minor or otherwise non-independent coverage (most of which is actually about companies they participate in financing. PK650 (talk) 04:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I was unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources. I wouldn't consider the Crunchbase article mentioned in the nom statement to be significant, it barely says anything about Cultivation Capital. signed, Rosguill talk 04:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - ranked #1,938 of all firms. We are a charity, not a free web-host for
vultureventure capitalists. Bearian (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC) - Delete. fails WP:CORP, Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources, so I don't think it has passed the general requirements.-Nahal(T) 20:41, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Hyperbolick (talk) 22:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.