Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cundari Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cundari Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company heavily edited by SPAs that has been WP:BOMBARDed with unreliable links, mostly from company itself. The two reliably sourced links are trivial mentions. I'm guessing some of the editors have a COI with the advertising agency. If article is kept it will need to be heavily edited. FuriouslySerene (talk) 19:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and clean up. Though the sources are generally poor at the moment (generally niche trade mags and websites) The Globe and Mail] (a large circulation general news source) seems to have several meatier news articles about the company. They did win a top global award after all, therefore seem to have achieved some success. Unfortunately any advertising agency worth its salt will be good at self publicity, so editors will need to keep an eye on it! Sionk (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide links to the "several meatier news articles" you mention? There is only one article by the Globe on the page and it's mostly about Armenia rather than Cundari. I'd consider that a fairly trivial mention, as the article provides almost no information about Cundari. FuriouslySerene (talk) 13:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you didn't see the link I posted in my comment, e.g.[1][2][3]. Sionk (talk) 20:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These seem like somewhat trivial mentions, since they aren't really about the company itself (two are about BMW Canada's ad campaign). Not sure they establish notability, or give much (if any) information about the company. FuriouslySerene (talk) 21:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now instead as although I found at the usual searches, News, Books, browser and Highbeam, there's nothing better convincing unless this can be better improved. SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:CORPDEPTH, and clearly don't meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.