Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber-Enhanced Working Dog
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cyber-Enhanced Working Dog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously PRODed but clearly not notable. All sources I can see are recycled press releases from 2014. Mccapra (talk) 20:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Products. Mccapra (talk) 20:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:TNT. Even after several users tried to fix this, it’s still a mess. Bearian (talk) 00:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Delete. The sources found, both those cited on the article and the results of an internet search, seem to mirror each other, basically coming from a primary source, the press release/research from NCSU, and some local websites that picked up from it. Not sufficient to meet notability standards. Prof.PMarini (talk) 01:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.