Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DAEWOO International
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. a distinct entity (non-admin closure) -- Trevj (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- DAEWOO International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Daewoo already exists. West Eddy (talk) 15:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Are they really about the same topic? If so, then
Speedy Deleteper A10 --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 15:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Both say they were founded in 1967 as Daewoo Industrial. I added a speedy delete, but someone removed it believing that they were two distinct companies. West Eddy (talk) 15:28, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- (edit conflict)They are two distinct companies, Daewoo International is cited in Daewoo. Keep and Move to Daewoo International is my new !vote, DAEWOO shoudn't be in all caps, or should it? --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 15:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Both say they were founded in 1967 as Daewoo Industrial. I added a speedy delete, but someone removed it believing that they were two distinct companies. West Eddy (talk) 15:28, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Daewoo International is listed as a subsidiary of POSCO (and that corresponds to the information in this article). The Daewoo article lists it as a former constituent company of the Daewoo Group. The complexity of the company history and restructuring suggests that there is value in keeping this as separate article and certainly a redirect to either POSC or Daewoo would be unhelpful and confusing. --AJHingston (talk) 15:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep- Lose the ALLCAPS per MOS, retitle Daewoo International (currently a redirect to Daewoo)or Daewoo International Corporation (which is redlinked in Daewoo as one of six surviving named subsidiaries, 4 of which have articles, one other redlink), and abbreviated Daewoo International Corp. in other articles. Dru of Id (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I may have added to the confusion when I speedy deleted a version as copyvio - and then created a redirect to DAEWOO. Besides, even if this were to be deleted as an insufficiently notable company, the title should be redirected somewhere - The new owner, POSCO, may be a valid target. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Although it looks like an advertisement at present, it could be improved. Biscuittin (talk) 10:03, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And it has been improved. Biscuittin (talk) 09:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Article is now at Daewoo International per a move request. Nyttend (talk) 12:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.