Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Spice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete as copyright infringement. NAC. Joe Chill (talk) 19:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Spice

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable pirate radio DJ, completely unreferenced Rapido (talk) 14:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I don't know, but I've definitley heard of this guy before, and I don't even listen to DJs.--Lionmadness (talk) 20:16, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 21:18, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And where have you looked for this "coverage"?--Lionmadness (talk) 21:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google, Google News, and Google Books. Joe Chill (talk) 21:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where have you looked? Answer: "Nowhere". Joe Chill (talk) 21:31, 25 December 2009 (UTC)^{[citation needed]}[reply]

Have you got a source that proves that Lionmadness hasn't looked anywhere? Otherwise, don't make comments like that.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 21:40, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Mr Chill, I am looking for notable converage as we speak, thank you very much.--Lionmadness (talk) 21:42, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 21:44, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Chill should really be apologizing for that outburst. It really was unacceptable.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 23:35, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well Lionmadness did ask Joe Chill a little sarcastically about "coverage", before he stated whether he had looked for any himself! Rapido (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine to me. It just sounds like Lionmadness was interested in knowing where to look and there is nothing wrong with that, especially in an Afd discussion. I see nothing wrong with the edits of Lionmadness.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 23:54, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay AD, you don't need to worry about me, but it WAS quite offensive and is not really acceptable at all, particularly not in a discussion where particiapnts need to not throw stones. So yes, Joe Chill, you owe me an apology. You can apologize to me here.--Lionmadness (talk) 00:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if I mis-assumed your comment was sarcastic. However, here should really be for debate about the AFD. Any personal correspondence, apologies or otherwise, should really take place in user talk pages. Rapido (talk) 00:05, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. It did seem like it was meant in a rude way. Joe Chill (talk) 00:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted :)--Lionmadness (talk) 00:21, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is good to see that cleared up. Now can people please respect the WP:AGF policy in future and not accuse others of being sarcastic. That way, these problems wouldn't start in the first place.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 00:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google UK Search We are looking pretty good.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 00:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- None of those sources are significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 19:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - I'm having a very hard time finding any reliable sources about this DJ. I found one that has been clearly plagiarized, a word-for-word copy and paste of paragraph two, which alone would rate a copyvio. The whole article appears to be a crappy cut and paste job. Please delete ASAP and start over, folks. Bearian (talk) 00:50, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This quote: "I wanted to learn how the whole thing works from the artist to the label to the whole distribution side of things" seems to WP:OR that has been copied onto three other websites. Bearian (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is likewise a quote without any attribution, so it must be WP:OR. Bearian (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why speedy delete? Let this Afd run its course. There is far more concensus in support of keeping this article anyway.--AtlanticDeep (talk) 03:09, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs are based on guidelines so there is more support for deleting this article. Joe Chill (talk) 19:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.