Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagmar Calais

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dagmar Calais

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. I can't find any reliable sources to add to this article. It has been tagged for attention since 2016 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:50, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nomination, the subject does not meet WP:NARTIST. There are also WP:V issues, the majority of biography content being unsourced. ––FormalDude talk 03:40, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment when I read her CV, I'm not convinced that she's met any of your notability criteria for artists; it's all rather minor. But she does have a webpages where she lists coverage she's received in the press: [1]. Most of that coverage is in local newspapers and none of it is in specialized art publications. If she's notable at all, then per the GNG. (I haven't yet read all the coverage.) Vexations (talk) 10:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.