Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Gislason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:49, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dale Gislason

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Patently non-notable subject, ex-CEO of a non-notable company. I'd love to speedy delete it but it's been here so long I'm wondering whether there's something I'm missing! Fails WP:GNG dismally. Sionk (talk) 20:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it seems to me very likely that there are non-digital sources for someone like this. I have stubified the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:59, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems counterproductive to delete 95% of the article before the AfD is concluded. Do you have any evidence of offline sources? Sionk (talk) 12:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable enough and reads like a CV. Kierzek (talk) 01:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Online sources are lacking, and there's nothing in the article that leads me to think there will be (m)any offline sources either. Moswento ^talky 14:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.