Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Diaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Diaz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, fails WP:ARTIST. The only reference is a blurb for an audio compilation. Note: possible self-promotion. Note 2: this is not the Dan Diaz whose wife chose assisted suicide (the dates of birth are different). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This person fails WP:ARTIST by a mile. Eat me, I'm a red bean (talk · contribs) 12:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear to be notable. -O.R.^Comms 14:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Likely delete for now as I simply found nothing better with the search "Dan Diaz composer music" aside from a few mentions but nothing to suggest outstandingly good improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Searches turned up nothing to show notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.