Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Lamothe
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e deckertalk 19:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Dan Lamothe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Junior journalist for the Washington Post, previously of a blog. Only sources currently are from the blog and the post itself. A google search did not turn up much. The claim that he is award winning is misleading as he won a minor award for his military reporting. Overall fails WP:AUTHOR Mrfrobinson (talk) 17:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 18:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (jive) @ 20:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (jive) @ 20:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- DeleteHis work as a journalist does not rise to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.