Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danick Paquette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danick Paquette

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The best coverage I found was this, which isn't nearly enough. Rlendog (talk) 13:12, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for being the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League penalty minutes leader for a season. I think that passes WP:NHOCKEY #4 "Achieved preeminent honors in a lower minor or major junior league", although it is just a statistical leadership. I think it makes the subject encyclopedic.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leading the QMJHL in penalty minutes is not close to a preeminent honor.Joeykai (talk) 21:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We actually list what the pre-eminent honours are in that one. Top-ten all time career scorer or a First-Team all star. It used to say "such as" but when a certain user started making a similar argument to this and was using any award given out at all such as scholastic player of the year a discussion removed the "such as" to make it only those two. That being said not saying leading PIMS can't get your enough sources to be notable, but he will just have to do it through GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 14:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG and NHOCKEY, can't find anything that makes him particularly notable, leading a statistical category for one season in junior does not help.18abruce (talk) 09:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no records in major junior hockey of Quebec are alone to establish notability. Paquette is not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find anything meeting GNG and pre-eminent honours for stats is restricted to being one of the top 10 best career scorers of all time in the league so leading PIMs for a season doesn't do it. -DJSasso (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.