Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Cepeda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 15:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Cepeda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The mysterious nature of Cepeda is interesting, but there is insufficient inline citation to verify all the claims that are being made. Three references exist, two are to the missing person's report, the other is to an unsafe site that is a broken link (possibly a hoax). I would say WP:NN and most likely a hoax. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 14:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:01, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:01, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. Pure hoax. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 16:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom, likely hoax. -KH-1 (talk) 05:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The broken link was fixed, and Richie Rich is a myth/legend hometown of Richmond, CA. JasminJaye 17:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.