Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Mindel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Mindel

No indication of how this cinematographer is notable. Fails WP:CREATIVE RadioFan (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It looks like he does meet WP:CREATIVE because he has works "in many significant libraries". Drawn Some (talk) 21:47, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for same reason as stated above. By the way, if other cinematographers can have article, why not Mindel's? And there's plenty of indication. For one, he was cinematographer on the highly-anticipated Star Trek, which is about to become one of the biggest hits of the year in addition to currently being the best-reviewed wide-release movie of the year. He was also cinematographer on the international box office hits Enemy of the State, Shanghai Noon, Spy Game, The Skeleton Key, and Mission: Impossible III. Yeah, I'd say that's pretty notable. --From Andoria with Love (talk) 21:49, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:CREATIVE for "played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work". --Pontificalibus (talk) 21:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:CREATIVE Chzz ► 02:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.