Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Lockwood
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Danny Lockwood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet the notability guideline for people. Most of the references are to Lockwood's own publications (his now-defunct local free newspaper The Press, or his self-published book). The few independent sources are passing mentions in coverage of his legal dispute with a government minister, a single event. – Joe (talk) 09:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 09:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. Although of course I hope others will participate in this discussion, this article should be eligible for soft deletion. There was a {{BLPPROD}} in 2011 which initially made me think it wasn't PROD-able, but that's actually not the case. – Joe (talk) 12:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.