Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dapat Alam Mo!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dapat Alam Mo!

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most notable thing about show is it was replaced by Family Feud after 4 months. Sources are press release and 2 YouTube videos. Fails WP:GNG Slywriter (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Slywriter (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~, very short-lived show that had some publicity for a very short period of time around its broadcast, but not significant enough to assert notability. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:03, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the basis of the subsequent !votes that assert the show is still running, i'll withdraw my delete, however I remain unconvinced of it's notability to change to a keep. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Philippines. Cortesy ping: @Slywriter, Bungle, and Liz: —usernamekiran (talk) 17:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Founded sources that may add to the article (http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/publicaffairs/content/821759/high-rating-news-magazine-show-dapat-alam-mo-airs-on-gma-starting-february-14/story ; https://www.lionheartv.net/2021/10/review-gtvs-dapat-alam-mo-shares-relevant-news-and-information/ ; https://www.lionheartv.net/2022/02/dapat-alam-mo-a-top-rater-during-its-pilot-week-in-gma-network/). SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First one is a press release. Second is an interview and third is I don't know what. Lionheartv.net doesn't exactly inspire confidence as a reliable source. Slywriter (talk) 03:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Slywriter: I think we need to mention other Filipino Wikipedians to give their opinion regarding this. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be surprised if Lionheart.TV passes WP:RS. This needs WP:THIRDPARTY RS that gives it WP:GNG coverage. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Lionheart.TV, I think it's good enough as a supporting reference but otherwise I would prefer Philippine mainstream media sources if those were available. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:18, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SeanJ 2007, LionHearTV is reliable. However, I wouldn't consider the source from GMA Network. Any show from a certain network which receives coverage from its website is considered a primary source. ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 10:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List_of_programs_previously_broadcast_by_GMA_Network#Informative_2 where it is mentioned. There are several news articles about the program BUT they are mostly generated by its parent company, GMA Network. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The nominator seems to have misinterpreted the article. The show is still ongoing on GTV, where it premiered October last year. It was simulcast on its sister/main channel GMA for a few weeks early this year before being replaced by a game show.

I found some reliable sources which talk about the show: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. It even received coverage for months since it was launched. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:TVSHOW. ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 10:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - I made some minor improvements and added a couple of non-paywalled sources. Most of the sources identified above seem to be from the same syndicated feed and use similar cast photos, but if the show is indeed still on, it's a weak keep. Anyone who currently watches the show is welcome to chime in. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep, Delete or Redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:NTV with sources presented above. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 22:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.