Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dario Margeli
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Dario Margeli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. ~ Rob13Talk 09:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- KeepThe article in discussion seams to have been last updated in 2013 and the article already contains many valuable references. After that there have been many news articles that have appeared on the person subject of the article, and therefore this article should be valid and should continue to exist in Wikipedia. The artist is relevant to the music scene, particularly in the Italian language indie-music community. Here are some articles that have appeared in independent reputable websites and blogs after 2013:
- In English:
- Italian Radio:
- https://radiosenisenews.it/2017/10/28/il-cantautore-dario-margeli-pubblica-una-nuova-canzone-dal-titolo-come-reagire/
- Italian music charts: The artist also appears regularly charting on the Italian independent artists music chart. There is no direct link, as these charts get updated and the link to the old charts get deleted. There is a snapshot of such charts on the artists official site https://dariomargeli.wordpress.com/press-links/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nayumadehrafti (talk • 13:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)contribs) 09:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as artist seems to be too trivial. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Keepas the artist is relevant in the independent rock community in Italy and has also appearances on websites in English speaking countries and Spain. Non of the references are trivial. For example, the artist has mentions in Rockit.it website, which is the 3rd most important music website in Italy (In terms of Alexa traffic and Facebook followers). There are articles in the very busy and exclusive Vice magazine on the artist. There are 16,100 results in a Google Search for the artists. In addition to the references in the main article and the references mentioned in previous points of this article, you can find even more articles on the artist:
- Spain music journal example (In Spanish): https://mirolloeselindie.wordpress.com/2017/01/02/things-that-are-ok-about-me-el-nuevo-trabajo-de-dario-margeli/ http://muzikalia.com/la-playlist-emergente-la-semana-2/
- More Italy examples (In Italian): http://indiepercui.altervista.org/dario-margeli-mente-autoproduzione/
The artist is relevant in these regions. Editors should be aware that there is a music community beyond the English-language media. The artist also has mentions in English language media as described earlier in the earlier points of this dicussion.
Nayumadehrafti (talk) 15:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- You've already !voted keep once, so I've struck your second !vote. The sources you've provided do not appear to meet WP:RS. ~ Rob13Talk 08:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hey Rob13 you mention meeting WP:RS stnadard. I have looked at WP:RS and as mentioned in previous notes on these pages, many of the sources are from "well-established news outlets". That is in Italy. To facilitate your work we even provided a page that does analysis on which are the important music news outlets in Italy. Here is an article that analyzes which are the important music news outlets in Italy, and given that some the articles on this individual appear on these sites, the WP:RS requirement of "well established new outlets" is perfectly met. http://www.fabriziogalassi.com/2015/06/15/quali-sono-i-siti-musicali-piu-influenti-in-italia-la-classifica-di-maggio-2015/ --Nayumadehrafti (talk) 11:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- That's a blog post, not an article. ~ Rob13Talk 17:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hey Rob13 Fabrizio Galassi is a music industry researcher. His site, which you call blog does research on what sites are most influential in music in Italy. If you don't like his research, you can do one yourself and you will find out that the important music information websites in Italy are the one's that appear in his article. Just because you live in Seattle doesn't mean that significant music news outlets in other countries suddenly don't count. In Seattle you may read Pitchfork, in Italy they read Rockit.it. --Nayumadehrafti (talk) 20:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- That's a blog post, not an article. ~ Rob13Talk 17:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hey Rob13 you mention meeting WP:RS stnadard. I have looked at WP:RS and as mentioned in previous notes on these pages, many of the sources are from "well-established news outlets". That is in Italy. To facilitate your work we even provided a page that does analysis on which are the important music news outlets in Italy. Here is an article that analyzes which are the important music news outlets in Italy, and given that some the articles on this individual appear on these sites, the WP:RS requirement of "well established new outlets" is perfectly met. http://www.fabriziogalassi.com/2015/06/15/quali-sono-i-siti-musicali-piu-influenti-in-italia-la-classifica-di-maggio-2015/ --Nayumadehrafti (talk) 11:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Keep People know who this artist is in Italy. --Eurovacationexpert (talk) 12:23, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Sock !vote struck. GABgab 17:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 12:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 12:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 12:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Not enough coverage. This can change in the future. gidonb (talk) 03:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.