Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dasha Nekrasova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 05:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dasha Nekrasova

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is self-promotional and self-aggrandizing; notability standards make this article unfitting. Yellow-billed Loon (talk) 02:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Yellow-billed Loon (talk) 02:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Yellow-billed Loon (talk) 02:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - maybe not quite notable enough as an actor alone but with the media her podcast and the acting seems notable. Winterborn (talk) 03:05, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I mean I want to say speedy delete, but it probably doesn't meet the criteria for speedy deletion. WP:SOAPBOX seems to be the appropriate rationale here.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 02:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep, subject has significant coverage in several reliable sources (The Cut, The New York Times, The New Yorker, Hollywood Reporter etc.) thus meeting general notability criteria and notability criteria for actors. Pinchofhope (talk) 04:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Satisfies WP:GNG with multiple in-depth sources such as The Cut ([1] and [2]), The Times, Teen Vogue and Vice. The coverage is not just about the Infowars interview, so WP:BLP1E does not apply. Don't see signs of WP:SOAPBOX (but it has been fixed up since that comment). Achaea (talk) 17:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG.-Splinemath (talk) 17:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.