Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Everett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Robert Everett (computer scientist). Black Kite (talk) 10:29, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Everett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Only brief mentions in a few articles (actually referred to as "brief mention" in the citations), and I'm not seeing anything more substantial when I search. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:39, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge what little content there is with his father's article Robert Everett (computer scientist) per WP:PRESERVE. I'm also unable to find significant coverage (though it's not helped by him sharing a name with a criminal and an author) to justify a standalone bio. However, he could have a mention of a sentence or two in his father's article, since it is relevant to that and the invention in question was shared with his dad. Valenciano (talk) 20:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 21:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable enough for a bio article in WP. I expect the discussion to be "brief" as the mentions in sources. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with his father's article Dishv80 (talk) 08:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Torn between Delete and Merge - Definitely not worth its own article but the subject isn't even mentioned in the article on his father. SPACKlick (talk) 11:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.