Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Gilbert (game designer) 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. — Nearly Headless Nick 15:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable biography which fails WP:BIO. No reliable sources to support importance. Andre (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO. Establishing notability and finding review sites as reliable sources for indy games is something that needs to be ongoing here on WP. However, creating articles on their developers seems like a step too far, when there's so little to put in the articles. QuagmireDog 00:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Just as a minor aside, how much can be written should not be a criterion for keeping or deleting articles. A million short articles about not particularly exciting subjects are far preferable to a dozen long and boring rambles about stuff that doesn't merit it. Grace Note 10:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:BIO. MER-C 06:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I don't know what all the alphabetti spaghetti is supposed to mean but no reason not to have a short article on anyone who creates "notable" computer games. Grace Note 10:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 16:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground. The Kinslayer 10:11, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.