Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Chisum
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- David Chisum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks notability. Bgsu98 (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Television. Bgsu98 (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- SIGCOV from LA Times here and here. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The LA Times clippings establish enough notability in conjunction with the rest of the article. IrishOsita (talk) 02:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as per the Los Angeles Times coverage and other sources in the article fir a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.