Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Cory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn (non-admin closure) JayJay^{What did I do?} 01:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Cory

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Fails WP:PROFESSOR JayJay^{What did I do?} 18:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just being a teacher is not notable in itself. The second paragraph hints at importance, but it is unsourced. Piguy101 (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks David Eppstein for sourcing the second paragraph. I am striking my !vote. Piguy101 (talk) 00:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep—h-index of 57, with his most-cited paper clocking in at 1585 cites and 30 papers with >100 cites. Only 19 Canada Excellence Research Chairs have been awarded thus far, each award comes with a serious amount of money (up to $10M over seven years), and he managed to snag one. The subject of this article runs laps around WP:ACADEMIC. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 19:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per WP:PROF#C1 and #C5. In particular the claim by the nominator that there is no indication of notability is false; the CERC is an indication of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete . I don't see enough multiple independent reliable sources. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Click on the scholar link and you will find 12724 of them. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Clear keep on basis of WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.