Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Inglis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Schminnte^{[talk to me]} 17:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David R. Inglis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic, sources online are partly about a different guy who worked on the atom bomb. Andre🚐 08:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Social science, and England. Andre🚐 08:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article was in terrible shape (I have trimmed a lot of unsourced and unverifiable information), and there were fewer reviews of his books than I might have expected. But I think there's still a case for WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF#C1 (citation counts 304 for Culture and everyday life, 292 for An invitation to social theory, 207 for "The body in sociology", and 164 for The uses of sport) and maybe for WP:PROF#C8 (supposed founder of a notable journal). —David Eppstein (talk) 22:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, I think it would be helpful if the nominator reviewed the article since it's been improved.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Per David Eppstein improvements. Svartner (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: greatly improved since the nomination. Owen× ☎ 00:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.