Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rudolf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Proposed redirect target does not exist. Sandstein 18:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David Rudolf

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by IP objecting to it. Subject is just another lawyer. No special notability asserted. Same subject (per username) also adds to the article, establishing a COI. Alexf^(talk) 10:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom. -- Alexf^(talk) 10:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I endorsed the PROD, just not notable enough. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 14:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Death of Kathleen Peterson Although I don't think he's notable enough for a separate article, he is not "just another lawyer". He has been a major participant in one very high profile case and also participated in two other cases involving subjects with Wikipedia articles. The fact that there has been COI contribution to the article doesn't make the subject any less notable. There is current discussion for redirecting Kathleen Peterson and possibly Michael Peterson (criminal) to Death of Kathleen Peterson. 75.182.115.183 (talk) 22:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability requirements. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet PROF, and does not meet BASIC/GNG. Sam Sailor 18:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.