Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Shoemaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David Shoemaker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources. Roxy the dog. bark 18:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All sources presented in the article are either self-published or are otherwise linked to the subject. No evidence turned up in searches that there are independent reliable sources about the subject available. Does not pass the general or any applicable specific notability guideline. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete G-search "David Shoemaker + "Thelema" + "Psychology"; a number of passing mentions, no in-depth coverage of his work or life in independent sources. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A quick search throws up nothing.Slatersteven (talk) 13:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete although this is the sort of article that should probably be archived somewhere as a perfect example of how not to write a BLP. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.