Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Toews (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that this topic meets the general notability guidelines 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David Toews

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP: NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 05:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 05:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Flibirigit (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agreed that he fails WP:NHOCKEY, but WP:GNG supersedes that and it was plainly shown at the last AfD of this article that he meets GNG. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 22:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the claim that Toews passes GNG is passed on a flaed understanding of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Perhaps flaed, but the arguments of the last AFD are persuasive enough. In particular this from the winnipeg free press, and this from USA today. The USA today article could be seen as routine coverage of a player opting to sign, however national american coverage of a guy choosing to go to college is very unusual and therefore, I believe, notable.18abruce (talk) 22:43, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GNG was completely shown to be met on the last Afd so failing NHOCKEY doesn't matter. -DJSasso (talk) 11:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG, which trumps WP:NHOCKEY, as was brought out in the first AfD. Ejgreen77 (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GNG. Rlendog (talk) 15:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.