Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dax Callner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dax Callner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested Prod - No indication of Notability - Quick search reveals mainly single line mentions of the name in questionable reliability sources. Does not seem to comply with WP:BIO guidelines. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 16:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no notabilty here. resisting nasty comment. people should resist making articles on someone they know who has a small association with something notable. that connection does not make them notable. such articles can reflect badly on innocent people who do not want to be mentioned here. Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No independent reliable sources with nontrivial coverage, let alone the number and substance required to justify a Wikipedia article. This is just spamvertising. DreamGuy (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Totally non-notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Couldn't be less notable if he tried - Vartanza (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.