Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeSoL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 08:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DeSoL

It may well be true that this band is well-known in some circles, but there is no evidence of notability in the article - which has been created and added to by a suspiciously large number of one-off users Deb (talk) 12:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there seem to be a few news hits for them [1]. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Claim of billboard charting does not show up for me at billboard. What are Triple A charts? Two of their album articles claim allmusic professional reviews that do not exist. Allmusic [2] and short review [3] Duffbeerforme (talk) 04:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard AC Chart Listing and a blurb on Billboard commenting on it being the highest debut in AC history.

Does the Adult Contemporary Billboard chart count as a national music chart?

Here's two more articles from Billboard that discuss the band itself a bit more...although they seem like they might overlap a bit.

Washington Post article & New York Times article. --Onorem ♠Dil 11:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I just checked the interwiki links and they are fake. Deb (talk) 12:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: trivial coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 08:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Onorem. Coverage by Washington Post and New York Times makes them notable. Ancemy (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as they have a charted single on a major chart, coupled with significant source coverage. Hot AC is indeed a notable chart. Not sure where the AAA charts came from, but sure as heck not Billboard. Oh yeah, and having the highest AC debut in the history of that chart, isn't that a good assertation? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.