Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/December (2021 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Convinced by the arguments presented below - film is in progress and coverage is flowing.

Thank you everyone for participating and assuming good faith. If you disagree with this decision, please take your objections and concerns to Deletion Review instead of my talk page. Thanks again and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 23:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December (2021 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTCRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON, the film has not even been confirmed its release date, just saying 2022.--Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 14:12, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sufficient verification that principal photography commenced (Dec 2020) and theatrical release is scheduled for March 5, 2022. Wait for the release. WP:CRYSTAL definitely does not apply. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:IAR and WP:CREEP. I’m unable to see how the encyclopedia or reader experience is improved by following the destructive Afd and notability guidelines which indicate this and many other informative and factually accurate articles about topics with verifiable existence need to be deleted. The guidelines need to be revamped to remove their destructive effects, but in the meantime we must simply ignore them per IAR, a pillar policy. —В²C ☎ 16:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as there is enough information for an article, albeit barely.Jackattack1597 (talk) 21:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.