Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepsheel Bharat
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Deepsheel Bharat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PRODed as "Claims no notability. Fails WP:GNG." was dePRODed without giving any reason. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, a daily newspaper with 20,000 copies circulation is notable. --Soman (talk) 02:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Failed verification. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 19:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- In what sense? I found several RNI hits online. --Soman (talk) 21:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- And would you mind showing some of those RNI or whatever to the community? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- In what sense? I found several RNI hits online. --Soman (talk) 21:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Failed verification. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 19:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 01:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 01:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete--Fails notability test.Light❯❯❯ Saber 16:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as still not significant enough and this is simply a mere listing, absolutely nothing of genuine substance. SwisterTwister talk 18:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.