Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denice Klarskov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 16:35, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Denice Klarskov

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extrabladet is a tabloid and not an RS. Everything else is very short coverage of a porn performer presenting a radio show for one week. In no way does this pass GNG or ENT Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Keep - It's like you didn't even look at the article during WP:BEFORE with sources like Berlingske [1] and Dagbladet Information [2]. You also cannot simply dismiss the reliability of a newspaper simply because of its tabloid size format i.e. the New York Post & New York Daily News.[3][4] With Danish sources from Google News like Se og Hør, Ekstra Bladet, B.T., TV2 consistently covering her, she is clearly a popular celebrity in her country passing WP:ENT. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EB is a tabloid not just in size but also in terms of being yellow press. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You know this how? Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:18, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lived in Denmark for 4 years. Was able to read enough of the press to know what was news and what was scandle/gossip rag. @Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:ENT / WP:BASIC. PORNBIO has been deprecated & there's nothing better. Sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Few sources, but meets WP:BASIC.Guilherme Burn (talk) 22:47, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What sources do you think pass gng and why do you think they pass? Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, sources exist - search for them. Especially if the nominator knows the Danish language, one example hereBerlingske "jeg-naar-aldrig-at-taenke-paa-det-som-sex", and they call her "Danmarks mest benyttede pornomodel" (Denmark's most widely used porn model)[5] Christian75 (talk) 23:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 07:14, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - Most of the references are fairly trite, and as previously pointed out, tabloid fare. Searches through news come up with these and similar results. A couple of them used the exact same verbiage. She probably isn't completely typical of others in her industry in that she has her own company, and has appeared in some other types of shows but do these things make her notable? We still have the problem of not being able to have a meaningful biography despite these myriad sources. ogenstein (talk) 02:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete articles comes up far short of the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – meets WP:BASIC/WP:GNG with significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The WP:THREE are [6] [7] [8], and if you don't like EB as an WP:RS, there's BT, and if you don't like BT as an WP:RS, there's the TV2 documentary, and there are yet more out there (here's one about whether her Wikipedia article lists her correct weight or not, LOL, I think they have a point: why was weight in the article? Is she like a boxer that has to meet a certain weight class?). – Levivich 04:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anyone is suggesting that she doesn't exist, just that the type of coverage she receives does not support her having a standalone page. I see some comments as to her meeting WP:BASIC but when I consider those linked pages, I'm not convinced. The EB piece about her wiki page is trivial. Getting blocked on FB for a month? Less than trivial. TV2 is promoting their product. The three other referenced pieces (6,7,8) all fall under primary accounts and BASIC explicitly states that primary sources can support content but do not contribute to notability. ogenstein (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The notability factor is clearly not there no matter how far people try to stretch. Trillfendi (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – She is the protagonist of a Danish documentary, already cited above by Levivich, on the world of porn in Los Angeles. This one has been broadcasted several times in Italy by Cielo TV under the title Naked. Westmanurbe (talk) 21:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.