Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis (YouTuber)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Denis (YouTuber)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and has been written as WP:PROMO clearly not meeting with WP:NPOV. Abishe (talk) 09:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 09:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 09:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 09:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-nnotable Youtuber.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, obviously, as the creator of this article, I am biased in this discussion, but I believe that this person passes WP:GNG with the sources already in the article. He has received coverage for the announcement that he would be acting in a animated kids series, as can be seen here: [1] and here: [2]. There is also this source, [3], which provides a couple of paragraphs of coverage towards him. Admittedly, the third source is rather fluffy and does devote a couple of sentences to quotes, but I believe it still contributes enough information to count towards notability. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Devonian Wombat, The first two links you just showed us are passing mentions, they only mention the fact of him acting in an animated series, and the third doesn't even mention him all. Koridas (Speak) 21:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Koridas, scroll down to the bottom of the third source, I think you will find it does indeed mention him. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Devonian Wombat, It's one of the few non-primary sources that aren't a passing mention. Every other source is a primary, passing, or non-reliable source. Koridas (Speak) 21:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not that much reliable sources and no neutral tone. Koridas (Speak) 21:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - arguably, with 8,200,000 followers, he would be notable. Sadly, he viewers are of a younger demographic, so sourcing is problematic. Bearian (talk) 01:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains^(talk) 02:04, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:BIO — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.