Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Krum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Denise Krum

Just trying to be consistent in the lead-up to the election. I don't think that being a party president (as opposed to leader) gets her past WP:POLITICIAN. dramatic (talk) 21:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If she was leader of Labour or National, or had a particularly high profile, I would disagree. In the case of minor parties, I think a list of presidents on the party page would be more appropriate. Delete. --Helenalex (talk) 00:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to User Page She doesn't appear to be notable for anything else other than this one event. If she is successful in the upcoming elections, then move it back. Otherwise, delete. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 06:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She is a Party Leader, and her page gets red of a Red Link, which is why I wrote it Hugo999 (talk) 23:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the principal editors in the field of NZ politics you should be well aware of the difference between president and leader (Peter Dunne in this case) of a party. With the possible exception of National and Labour, the president tends to be fairly low profile and do little of note (barring scandals). Similarly, I decided not to contest the deletion of Catherine Delahunty given that her position in the Green party (co-convenor) was the equivalent of a president, not a leader. dramatic (talk) 20:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN, and could not find evidence of general notability.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.