Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Tucker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Tucker

Person seems to fail WP:BIO. Only stated achievement is the brief publication of a comic strip in a number of non-mainstream publications. Comic is now discontinued and has no article of its own; in light of the stated short run, I feel that the comic also likely lacks notability. Tyrenon (talk) 06:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. His 15 minutes are up. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete All his notability seems to rest on the one comic, which is in itself non-notable and is unlikely to gain notability in the future. I wrote the GA on LGBT comics, and found no mention of this work in general reliable sources on the topic (which doesn't mean no sources exist at all, but if they do, they are not many and are mostly blogs). I don't think the grant confers notability - doesn't nearly every artist and scientist in the world recieve such grants at some point in their career? I went for "weak" as some searching did find sources, but i found them to be either commerical, trivial mentions or blog-like, but others may disagree, [eg http://prismcomics.org/profile.php?id=117 Prism comics] is in blog format, but has an editorial board, so could be a RSYob Mod 12:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 14:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per insufficient notability and above comments by editors with expertise on this subject area. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.