Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dev Menaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎ as WP:CSD#A7 by Deb. ✗plicit 06:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dev Menaria

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it is already available in a draft. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dev_Menaria) nd Does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR nd WP:DADASAHEB . No significant coverage by independent secondary sources Worldiswide (talk) 04:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 April 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can we merge both articles with correction or should I update the old draft one? I mentioned about Dadasaheb falke award because I found those 2-3 articles regarding that. I'll do more research about this. IvivekChoudhary (talk) 05:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Rajasthan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sign of notability per WP:NACTOR or WP:BASIC. WP:DADASAHEB is not a policy or guideline that a biographical article can fail, but it is of course true that he has not received the Dadasaheb Phalke Award (from this it looks like he got the "Legends Dada Saheb Phalke Award", one of the copycat awards that pretend to be the real thing.) --bonadea contributions talk 13:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.