Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Development Trusts Association Scotland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:57, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Development Trusts Association Scotland

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NORG. No in-depth coverage exists from searches in Google, Google Books, Google News or Google News Archive. Given sources are either WP:PRIMARY or unrelated to the subject. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect: Searches find brief mentions of DTAS in respect of a variety of local projects in Bathgate, Cumnock, Hallglen, Newstead, etc., and in evidence to a Parliamentary Committee [1], but I have to agree with the nominator that the coverage about DTAS itself needed to establish WP:NORG notability is lacking. It is mentioned on the Local People Leading, so a redirect could be appropriate? (That said, the LPL page itself is dubious as notable in its own right.) AllyD (talk) 11:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AllyD: I agree that LPL is also of questionable notability. When I get time I will search for sources on it, but if nothing substantial comes up, it will be next for AfD. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The umbrella organisations such as these exist but tend not to attract the depth of coverage needed here. I am inclined to think that it would be better to focus on an article about the Development Trust phenonenon, for which such associations and projects provide examples (probably bedded in the Development trust article), but even that would need strong references to published assessments which I am struggling to find. AllyD (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks independent sources to meet WP:NORG. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 19:59, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.