Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhiuksham
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dhiuksham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 19:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy delete—g11: note link at bottom of page advertising a conference. i doubt that they coincidentally decided to enlighten the world with a stubby article on the sanskrit word for sun 17 days before their conference named that.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 01:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The English Wikipedia is not a Sanskrit dictionary. Mangoe (talk) 02:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with alf about the advertising, which I've removed from the article. What little remains of it should be deleted per WP:DICDEF. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.