Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhone revenue division
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 12:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dhone revenue division (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dhone revenue division
This article appears to be about a division of a state government in India, but has two problems. First, it has no references, and so fails verifiability. Second, it does not provide enough information to establish context, let along to determine organizational notability. This does not even provide enough information to locate reliable sources. An earlier version was already created in article space and moved to draft space, so that this version cannot be moved to draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Organizations, and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unless the author wishes to use citations, I see no way to verify what's said. Oaktree b (talk) 19:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep WP:GEOLAND I've added sources. I apologise for my proactive draftification to Draft:Dhone revenue division. I should have marked it as {{Sources exist}} — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- Clarifying further, I actually wanted to add refs after draftifying when I get time. However, I didn’t contemplate the user would simply recreate the article — DaxServer (mobile) (t · m · c) 13:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.