Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Benzi
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Diego Benzi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
appears to fail WP:NFOOTBALL Mayumashu (talk) 15:59, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 21:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Has not played in a fully professional league, failing WP:NFOOTBALL, and has not received any significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to pass WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 21:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've informed the article's creator of the AfD. In future, please let article creators know when their articles have been nominated so they can defend their work if need be. Cheers. Delusion23 (talk) 10:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 11:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The CSL is not fully pro, meaning he fails WP:NSPORT, and there is not enough significant coverage for him to meet WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:52, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - This nomination was missing step 3. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I've updated the log link to reflect April 5 as the start date. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.