Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil Muhallay Ki Haveli
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Amin Iqbal#Television as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dil Muhallay Ki Haveli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Amin_Iqbal#Television: director -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Same rationale for almost every nomination i guess. I am doubting whether WP:Before is done or not. It was broadcasted in 2013 and many Pakistani newspapers remove old coverage from their websites. Why a series broadcasted in 2013 need nomination discussion after more than a decade, and if its the case then all the old films/television related articles should be removed from wikipidea. It received some coverage as one can see here [1] Libraa2019 (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Libraa2019, This is a WP:ATA. Unless the source is unreliable or dubious, old archives can always be found. And if you doubt that I haven't done WP:BEFORE, why don't you provide some solid coverage (not some Google searches or even ROTM coverage) from RS that help establish WP:GNG, instead of doubting my intentions? —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.