Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diocese of Birobidzhan and Kuldur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diocese of Birobidzhan and Kuldur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promo. Organisation is notable, but this is an advertisement, including fax number. WP:TNT should be applied. The Banner talk 17:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I wouldn't object if large chunks of this were edited out, but I don't see anything in this article that is so bad as to demand deleting the whole article and wiping out its edit history. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Even the nomination says this organization is notable. --do ncr am 01:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:TNT shouldn't apply when a stub is a plausible alternative, and the first two sections seem unproblematic enough, even were everything else removed. --j⚛e decker ^talk 01:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.