Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diogo Piçarra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mz7 (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diogo Piçarra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable singer which doesn't meet any of the criteria set out at WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO Wes Wolf Talk 00:03, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:38, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
His second album also hit #1. Fuebaey (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Less than 3 months ago (Jan 27, 2017) Diogo Piçarra reached first place on Cision BLITZ which weekly measures the mediatic notoriety of portuguese musicians. BLITZ is the longest running music-only paper publication in Portugal adding credibilty to the result. He is also signed to Universal Music a global music corportation, which justifies the existence of the article in English. Wapunguissa (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.