Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirpy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:43, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dirpy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of the multiple services to offer an unofficial YouTube media downloader. Dirpy is not notable. Further, between the paid options and the "See also" link in the YouTube article, there is too much undue emphasis on Dirpy. LABcrabs (talk) 05:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 15:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 15:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 15:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is clearly a promotional piece. The most reliable sources, Wired, Fast Company, and some published book mention it literally in a single sentence each. Other sources appear to be less reliable, at least on the first glance. Anton.bersh (talk) 22:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.