Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodecagrammic antiprism
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dodecagrammic antiprism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mathcruft linking only pages without a description of this topic; no coverage in secondary independent sources I could find online: a web search mostly returns Wikipedia mirrors or indiscriminate listings (as well as a fantasy book (?)); no results on Google Scholar at all. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Our polyhedron articles are too full of "articles" like this one, on shapes with no in-depth coverage of their individual properties, only calculations of generic properties with cookie-cutter reference. Does not pass WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.