Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don K. Preston (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. The article was a copyvio of [1] and has been a copyvio since the first revision. Given that there were no revisions without significant copyright infringement, I opted to speedy delete the article. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don K. Preston

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was deleted in 2013 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don K. Preston), then re-created in 2015. Subject is still not notable. Page is mostly a direct copy of subject's bio at his own website ([2]). Retswerb (talk) 00:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Retswerb (talk) 02:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.Mccapra (talk) 10:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete or Draftify. I did a quick Google search on "Don K. Preston" and saw a ton of resources/mentions of him. He is a published author of multiple books. He is 100% notable enough for a wikipedia article, but this article hasn't been done properly. If someone is willing to claim it as a draft and fix it up with references and wikilinks and all that stuff, then my vote is Draftify. If someone doesn't step up to fix the article, then I am at a weak delete. Everything in the article is true and correct, just missing wikilinks, formatting, and references. Elijahandskip (talk) 18:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.