Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Kulasiri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 11:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don Kulasiri

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, fails to meet WP:NACADEMIC. No available sources to establish general notability. IdiotSavant (talk) 10:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. IdiotSavant (talk) 10:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Sri Lanka. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 10:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citation record does not support WP:PROF#C1 and I didn't see evidence of any other form of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kulasiri has been a full professor at Lincoln University since 1999. My understanding is that full professors at NZ universities meet criterion 5. Schwede 66 20:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. There are thousands, if not millions, of full professors. Being a full professor alone is not significant enough for WP:NPROF. Shoerack (talk) 00:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the number in NZ is considerably smaller than that, of course. Waikato appears to have roughly 100 full professors, for instance. Multiply that by the 8 universities in NZ, and ignore the fact that they're not all the same size, and you get probably less than 1000. That said, I agree that full professor alone should not be considered enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full professors in NZ are equivalent to distinguished/endowed professor in most Asian and North American universities and to a professor of a discipline in British universities, according to Academic ranks (Australia and New Zealand). Nurg (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I look there I see that it is tagged as dubious. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — per David Eppstein's rationale. Shoerack (talk) 00:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:PROF#C5 per Schwede66 and Nurg. Lincoln is a major institution of higher learning and research, and named chairs / distinguished professor appointments are rare in New Zealand. Paora (talk) 11:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I do not see that it is significant enough to remain a Wikipedia article. Villian Factman (talk) 11:36, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:ANYBIO, also do not see why a NZ professor should be treated any differently from professors elsewhere. Dan arndt (talk) 01:18, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.