Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donk!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Donk!

Unsourced, non-notable game by non-notable developer. Very few G-hits that are not user-generated content sites or fansites and zero G-archive hits that I could find. Addionne (talk) 13:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Updated for Dreamcast? This seems to be somewhat out-of-date, along with the issues mentioned by the nom. TN‑X-Man 18:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep The Amiga Magazine Rack has scads of review on-tap for this game, this is no less notable than any generic action game released for the PS3/360/Wii, which are again reviewed in several newstand magazines like the ones stored at the rack. Just tag it for references. Someone another 23:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Agree with Someoneanother. MuZemike (talk) 23:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's notable enough by virtue of having been published commercially. The article needs a makeover. 地炎風水闇陽 ^(Talk) 06:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by Nominator Thanks Someoneanother - I looked for sources out there and couldn't find any, but that site is a great resource. So now I just think that it needs a clean-up... :) Addionne (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My pleasure, the magazine rack isn't widely known and I only stumbled on it by accident once. Someone another 17:53, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.