Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donny Gillies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 00:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Donny Gillies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography, probably autobio., written in unencyclopedic tone with scant evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with the above review, however, in my opinion the subject is notable, see The Ottava Citizen, Montreal Mirror, Tiki art now: a volcanic eruption of art. I can imagine a well referenced and informative article. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Maybe it is WP:UGLY, maybe it is Wikipedia:Autobiography but Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL does show a few independant reviews to just pass Notability --Triwbe (talk) 20:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per sources listed above. Searching for 'Dirty Donny' turns up some more, including the customary Juxtapoz article usual for artists of this ilk [1].--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per preceding keep statements. Ty 23:49, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.