Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doomcraft
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 06:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Doomcraft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't meet the notability standard of WP:FICTION and lacks reliable sources. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No significant coverage in reliable source. Fails WP:FICT. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Fails both FICT and general notability. Celarnor Talk to me 05:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The article as it presently stands fails to assert real world notability, namely, through the lack of reliable, third party sources. It also fails to assert general notability, through third party souces, shown by Google, there seem to be none. I can't see how this could be merged, therfore, deletion would be best here. Steve Crossin (talk) (review) 06:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. This appears to be a random person's online persona in a video game. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 18:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. — Wenli (reply here) 22:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Why wasn't this speedied?--137.186.84.54 (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:21, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.